40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
0.60%
Positive ROE while VET is negative. John Neff would see if this signals a clear edge over the competitor.
0.25%
Positive ROA while VET shows negative. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a clear operational edge.
0.94%
ROCE below 50% of VET's 2.69%. Michael Burry would question the viability of the firm’s strategy.
46.43%
Gross margin 75-90% of VET's 56.70%. Bill Ackman would ask if incremental improvements can close the gap.
9.43%
Operating margin below 50% of VET's 28.02%. Michael Burry would investigate whether this signals deeper issues.
3.09%
Positive net margin while VET is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage vs. the competitor.