40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-2.36%
Negative ROE while VET stands at 1.44%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.13%
Negative ROA while VET stands at 0.64%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-1.21%
Negative ROCE while VET is at 1.35%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
41.46%
Gross margin 75-90% of VET's 51.05%. Bill Ackman would ask if incremental improvements can close the gap.
-18.38%
Negative operating margin while VET has 15.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-19.84%
Negative net margin while VET has 7.74%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.