40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-1.58%
Negative ROE while VET stands at 0.52%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.81%
Negative ROA while VET stands at 0.21%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-0.54%
Negative ROCE while VET is at 1.76%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
56.50%
Similar gross margin to VET's 58.65%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies have comparable cost structures.
-3.74%
Negative operating margin while VET has 19.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-6.69%
Negative net margin while VET has 2.56%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.