40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
21.65
P/E above 1.5x EQT's 13.21. Jim Chanos would check for potential multiple compression risks.
5.50
P/S less than half of EQT's 12.43. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
0.85
P/B of 0.85 while EQT has zero book value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset quality advantage.
23.87
Positive FCF while EQT shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.
10.58
P/OCF of 10.58 while EQT has no operating cash flow. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational advantage.
0.85
Fair value ratio of 0.85 while EQT has zero value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine valuation methodology.
1.15%
Earnings yield 50-75% of EQT's 1.89%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if lower yield reflects better quality.
4.19%
Positive FCF while EQT shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.