40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-3.37
Negative P/E while EQT shows 12.82. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
16.35
P/S above 1.5x EQT's 10.02. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
3.04
P/B of 3.04 while EQT has zero book value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset quality advantage.
46.17
Positive FCF while EQT shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.
14.68
P/OCF of 14.68 while EQT has no operating cash flow. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational advantage.
3.04
Fair value ratio of 3.04 while EQT has zero value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine valuation methodology.
-7.42%
Negative earnings while EQT shows yield of 1.95%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
2.17%
Positive FCF while EQT shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.