40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
7.78
Similar P/E to VET's 7.54. Guy Spier would investigate if similar multiples are justified by similar prospects.
5.19
P/S 50-75% of VET's 9.04. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
1.83
P/B less than half of VET's 4.32. David Dodd would verify if asset quality justifies this discount.
-438010.75
Negative FCF while VET shows P/FCF of 20.29. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
19.03
P/OCF 1.1-1.25x VET's 16.75. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior operating efficiency.
1.83
Fair value ratio less than half of VET's 4.32. David Dodd would verify if competitive position justifies this discount.
3.21%
Similar earnings yield to VET's 3.32%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar yields reflect similar quality.
-0.00%
Negative FCF while VET shows yield of 4.93%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.