40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
9.56
P/E above 1.5x VET's 5.26. Jim Chanos would check for potential multiple compression risks.
-21.40
Negative sales while VET shows P/S of 14.31. Joel Greenblatt would examine revenue recognition differences.
1.46
P/B 50-75% of VET's 2.49. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
43.92
Positive FCF while VET shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.
17.50
P/OCF 50-75% of VET's 30.70. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
1.46
Fair value ratio 50-75% of VET's 2.49. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
2.61%
Earnings yield 50-75% of VET's 4.76%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if lower yield reflects better quality.
2.28%
Positive FCF while VET shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.