40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
29.47
P/E above 1.5x VET's 15.46. Jim Chanos would check for potential multiple compression risks.
6.01
P/S less than half of VET's 16.05. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
0.85
P/B less than half of VET's 3.47. David Dodd would verify if asset quality justifies this discount.
91.85
Positive FCF while VET shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.
10.58
P/OCF less than half of VET's 39.89. David Dodd would verify if operating efficiency justifies this discount.
0.85
Fair value ratio less than half of VET's 3.47. David Dodd would verify if competitive position justifies this discount.
0.85%
Earnings yield 50-75% of VET's 1.62%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if lower yield reflects better quality.
1.09%
Positive FCF while VET shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.