40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-3.37
Negative P/E while VET shows 36.83. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
16.35
Similar P/S to VET's 15.93. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
3.04
Similar P/B to VET's 3.34. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
46.17
P/FCF 1.25-1.5x VET's 32.82. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better growth prospects.
14.68
P/OCF less than half of VET's 30.59. David Dodd would verify if operating efficiency justifies this discount.
3.04
Similar fair value ratio to VET's 3.34. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
-7.42%
Negative earnings while VET shows yield of 0.68%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
2.17%
FCF yield 50-75% of VET's 3.05%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if lower yield reflects better reinvestment.