40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-45.47
Negative P/E while VET shows 22.67. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
9.06
P/S less than half of VET's 21.39. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
2.75
Similar P/B to VET's 3.64. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
-230.94
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
20.29
P/OCF less than half of VET's 51.65. David Dodd would verify if operating efficiency justifies this discount.
2.75
Similar fair value ratio to VET's 3.64. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
-0.55%
Negative earnings while VET shows yield of 1.10%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-0.43%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.