40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
4.26
P/E less than half of VET's 12.34. Charlie Munger would verify if competitive advantages justify such a discount.
6.27
P/S less than half of VET's 16.80. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
2.34
P/B 50-75% of VET's 3.41. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
-146.35
Negative FCF while VET shows P/FCF of 51.91. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
22.46
Similar P/OCF to VET's 29.27. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
2.34
Fair value ratio 50-75% of VET's 3.41. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
5.87%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x VET's 2.03%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
-0.68%
Negative FCF while VET shows yield of 1.93%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.