40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-13.27
Negative P/E while VET shows 15.71. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
9.36
P/S less than half of VET's 19.62. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
2.59
P/B 50-75% of VET's 3.72. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
-52.26
Negative FCF while VET shows P/FCF of 236.87. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
28.84
Similar P/OCF to VET's 36.03. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
2.59
Fair value ratio 50-75% of VET's 3.72. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
-1.88%
Negative earnings while VET shows yield of 1.59%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-1.91%
Negative FCF while VET shows yield of 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.