40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
34.14
P/E above 1.5x VET's 17.18. Jim Chanos would check for potential multiple compression risks.
8.37
P/S less than half of VET's 18.53. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
3.03
Similar P/B to VET's 3.86. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
36.67
Positive FCF while VET shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.
16.80
P/OCF less than half of VET's 39.62. David Dodd would verify if operating efficiency justifies this discount.
3.03
Similar fair value ratio to VET's 3.86. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
0.73%
Earnings yield 50-75% of VET's 1.46%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if lower yield reflects better quality.
2.73%
Positive FCF while VET shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.