40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-3.38
Both companies show losses. Martin Whitman would check if industry conditions create special situations.
6.81
P/S less than half of VET's 24.15. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
0.93
P/B less than half of VET's 2.46. David Dodd would verify if asset quality justifies this discount.
-25.39
Negative FCF while VET shows P/FCF of 418.43. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
32.67
P/OCF 50-75% of VET's 57.99. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
0.93
Fair value ratio less than half of VET's 2.46. David Dodd would verify if competitive position justifies this discount.
-7.39%
Both companies show losses. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-3.94%
Negative FCF while VET shows yield of 0.24%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.