40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
16.95
P/E less than half of VET's 50.26. Charlie Munger would verify if competitive advantages justify such a discount.
7.80
P/S less than half of VET's 15.63. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
1.51
P/B less than half of VET's 3.17. David Dodd would verify if asset quality justifies this discount.
-80.63
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
26.88
Similar P/OCF to VET's 28.97. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
1.51
Fair value ratio less than half of VET's 3.17. David Dodd would verify if competitive position justifies this discount.
1.47%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x VET's 0.50%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
-1.24%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.