40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-20.39
Both companies show losses. Martin Whitman would check if industry conditions create special situations.
12.53
Similar P/S to VET's 16.03. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
1.90
Similar P/B to VET's 2.39. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
-102.63
Negative FCF while VET shows P/FCF of 522.94. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
25.93
P/OCF 50-75% of VET's 42.22. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
1.90
Similar fair value ratio to VET's 2.39. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
-1.23%
Both companies show losses. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.97%
Negative FCF while VET shows yield of 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
