40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
82.53
Positive P/E while VET shows losses. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.20
Similar P/S to VET's 12.73. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
1.98
Similar P/B to VET's 2.56. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
35.57
Positive FCF while VET shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.
14.55
P/OCF 50-75% of VET's 20.88. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
1.98
Similar fair value ratio to VET's 2.56. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
0.30%
Positive earnings while VET shows losses. John Neff would investigate earnings advantage.
2.81%
Positive FCF while VET shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.
