40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-253.75
Negative P/E while VET shows 560.45. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
3.89
P/S 50-75% of VET's 7.14. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
0.61
P/B less than half of VET's 1.35. David Dodd would verify if asset quality justifies this discount.
39.04
P/FCF above 1.5x VET's 22.19. Michael Burry would check for cash flow deterioration risks.
8.34
P/OCF 50-75% of VET's 15.01. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
0.61
Fair value ratio less than half of VET's 1.35. David Dodd would verify if competitive position justifies this discount.
-0.10%
Negative earnings while VET shows yield of 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
2.56%
FCF yield 50-75% of VET's 4.51%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if lower yield reflects better reinvestment.