40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
4.95
P/E less than half of VET's 10.00. Charlie Munger would verify if competitive advantages justify such a discount.
4.32
Similar P/S to VET's 4.10. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
0.94
P/B 1.25-1.5x VET's 0.72. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better growth prospects.
20.75
P/FCF less than half of VET's 177.68. David Dodd would verify if cash flow quality justifies this discount.
9.82
P/OCF 50-75% of VET's 15.37. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
0.94
Fair value ratio 1.25-1.5x VET's 0.72. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better prospects.
5.05%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x VET's 2.50%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
4.82%
FCF yield exceeding 1.5x VET's 0.56%. David Dodd would verify if cash flow quality justifies this premium.