PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-248.05%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AAG.DE at -0.76%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-41.74%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AAG.DE at -3.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.99%
Well above AAG.DE's 97.66% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AAG.DE at -53.18%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.20%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. AAG.DE's 933.04%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
108.48%
Some yoy increase while AAG.DE is negative at -248.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
101.79%
Some CFO growth while AAG.DE is negative at -147.10%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AAG.DE at -396.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while AAG.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
100.00%
Liquidation growth of 100.00% while AAG.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-297.51%
Both yoy lines negative, with AAG.DE at -37.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AAG.DE at -168.72%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while AAG.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.