PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2609.03%
Negative net income growth while AAG.DE stands at 3.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-22.60%
Negative yoy D&A while AAG.DE is 4.92%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AAG.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
208.01%
Well above AAG.DE's 77.18% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-147.78%
AR is negative yoy while AAG.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
147.78%
Inventory growth well above AAG.DE's 190.67%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
61.14%
AP growth of 61.14% while AAG.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
1803.94%
Some yoy usage while AAG.DE is negative at -287.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-154.00%
Both negative yoy, with AAG.DE at -127.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
73.48%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AAG.DE's 154.11%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-10.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with AAG.DE at -12.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
23800.00%
Acquisition growth of 23800.00% while AAG.DE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.98%
We reduce yoy other investing while AAG.DE is 19.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-8.74%
We reduce yoy invests while AAG.DE stands at 2.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while AAG.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.