PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
80.46%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 60.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
40.77%
Some D&A expansion while VPLAY-B.ST is negative at -6.38%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-518.26%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VPLAY-B.ST is 361.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1143.99%
Negative yoy inventory while VPLAY-B.ST is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.43%
Negative yoy usage while VPLAY-B.ST is 361.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1679.02%
Well above VPLAY-B.ST's 91.22%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-36.53%
Negative yoy CFO while VPLAY-B.ST is 224.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
15.28%
Some CapEx rise while VPLAY-B.ST is negative at -33.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.01%
Negative yoy acquisition while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while VPLAY-B.ST is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
15.14%
We have some outflow growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative at -33.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
15.33%
We have mild expansions while VPLAY-B.ST is negative at -166.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
292775.00%
Issuance growth of 292775.00% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.