PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
139.37%
Positive revenue growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
285.76%
Positive gross profit growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
83.62%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 1.67%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
206.72%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 1.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
39.75%
Positive net income growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
39.73%
Positive EPS growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
39.73%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.71%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 76.97%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-86.35%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 30.49%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-86.04%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 71.67%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 32.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-182.37%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is at 6.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
49.56%
Below 50% of AAG.DE's 301.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-1616.04%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AAG.DE is 427.04%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
61.76%
Below 50% of AAG.DE's 366.34%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-103.66%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-107.34%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AAG.DE is at 8.51%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.11%
Our AR growth while AAG.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
1.46%
We show growth while AAG.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
50.26%
Positive asset growth while AAG.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-248.65%
We have a declining book value while AAG.DE shows 4.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
45.18%
We have some new debt while AAG.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.44%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.