1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
638.68%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 5.28%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
151.45%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 23.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
135.18%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 61.99%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
132.19%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 61.99%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
133.19%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x AAG.DE's 120.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
132.76%
EPS growth similar to AAG.DE's 123.53%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
132.76%
Similar diluted EPS growth to AAG.DE's 123.53%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
572.60%
10Y CAGR of 572.60% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
572.60%
5Y CAGR of 572.60% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
706.51%
3Y CAGR of 706.51% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
341.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 341.00% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
9.82%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 9.82% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
9.82%
Net income/share CAGR of 9.82% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
878.41%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 878.41% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
655.76%
Equity/share CAGR of 655.76% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20280.38%
AR growth of 20280.38% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while AAG.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
45.93%
Asset growth of 45.93% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
36.86%
BV/share growth of 36.86% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
59.27%
Debt growth of 59.27% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.79%
We expand SG&A while AAG.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.