PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.50%
Negative revenue growth while AAG.DE stands at 10.94%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-120.10%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-208.11%
Negative EBIT growth while AAG.DE is at 3.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-208.30%
Negative operating income growth while AAG.DE is at 3.86%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-399.22%
Negative net income growth while AAG.DE stands at 4.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-400.00%
Negative EPS growth while AAG.DE is at 3.13%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-400.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AAG.DE is at 3.13%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.48%
OCF growth under 50% of AAG.DE's 154.11%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
53.77%
FCF growth under 50% of AAG.DE's 128.57%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
202.52%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 89.27%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
202.52%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 89.27%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
39.40%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AAG.DE's 89.27%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.78%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AAG.DE's 243.08%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-342.37%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is at 94.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-342.37%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is 94.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-251.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AAG.DE is 94.16%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1067.01%
Equity/share CAGR of 1067.01% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-73.67%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-58.40%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-18.00%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-16.67%
We have a declining book value while AAG.DE shows 1.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-40.97%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.04%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.