PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
53.64%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 0.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-168.68%
Negative gross profit growth while AAG.DE is at 3.21%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-7.40%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-7.39%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-8.95%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.00%
Slight or no buybacks while AAG.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
10.00%
Slight or no buyback while AAG.DE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
745.08%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 81.76%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
913.34%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 81.76%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
185.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 81.76%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
308.88%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 112.37%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
74.90%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AAG.DE's 112.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
-580.12%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-3303.26%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-743.20%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2563.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 367.82%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
187.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of AAG.DE's 367.82%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.45%
Our AR growth while AAG.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
89.51%
We show growth while AAG.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.77%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x AAG.DE's 5.44%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
-28.44%
We have a declining book value while AAG.DE shows 10.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
67.81%
We have some new debt while AAG.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.07%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.