PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.83%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
176.38%
Positive gross profit growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-34.51%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-34.40%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-34.26%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-33.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-33.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while AAG.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.92%
Negative OCF growth while AAG.DE is at 34.80%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-117.68%
Negative FCF growth while AAG.DE is at 18.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
192.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 78.76%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
250.44%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 78.76%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
541.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 78.76%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.79%
Positive OCF/share growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-86.07%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-422.31%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is at 17.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-2184.65%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is 17.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-94.84%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AAG.DE is 17.70%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
391.36%
Equity/share CAGR of 391.36% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.34%
Firm’s AR is declining while AAG.DE shows 0.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-97.41%
Inventory is declining while AAG.DE stands at 2.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-32.60%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-19.80%
We have a declining book value while AAG.DE shows 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
2.56%
We have some new debt while AAG.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.61%
SG&A growth well above AAG.DE's 3.70%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.