PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-62.44%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-83.77%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-86.58%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-86.58%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-178.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-183.11%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-183.11%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.00%
Share reduction while AAG.DE is at 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
334.07%
Positive OCF growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
222.11%
Positive FCF growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
6.27%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-51.03%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-62.10%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.13%
Positive OCF/share growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
0.05%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AAG.DE's 58.40%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-319.90%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-219.22%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-100.53%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
431.58%
Equity/share CAGR of 431.58% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
11.20%
Below 50% of AAG.DE's 85.57%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.51%
Firm’s AR is declining while AAG.DE shows 0.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-84.52%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-7.39%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-35.34%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
74.13%
Debt growth far above AAG.DE's 3.19%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.06%
We cut SG&A while AAG.DE invests at 6.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.