PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-39.55%
Negative revenue growth while AAG.DE stands at 25.87%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
2.50%
Positive gross profit growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
33.44%
Positive EBIT growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
33.44%
Positive operating income growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
32.34%
Positive net income growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
42.86%
Positive EPS growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
42.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
20.00%
Share change of 20.00% while AAG.DE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
20.00%
Diluted share change of 20.00% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.06%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AAG.DE's 13.35%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
-63.81%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 13.35%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-85.05%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.71%
Positive OCF/share growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-8.28%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-347.96%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-432.19%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-253.07%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.66%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while AAG.DE is at 344.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-79.36%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AAG.DE is at 3.15%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.39%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6903.06%
We show growth while AAG.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
133.54%
Positive asset growth while AAG.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-28.93%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
103.74%
We have some new debt while AAG.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.66%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.