PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.85%
Negative revenue growth while AAG.DE stands at 13.66%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
115.90%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 46.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
110.47%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 4.42%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
110.47%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 1.14%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
103.34%
Positive net income growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
102.75%
EPS growth of 102.75% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
102.75%
Diluted EPS growth of 102.75% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
20.03%
Share count expansion well above AAG.DE's 2.51%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
20.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above AAG.DE's 2.51%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
452.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 3.09%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-17.79%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 3.09%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-34.57%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.51%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-34.82%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-94.74%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-95.21%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
101.09%
Positive short-term CAGR while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.62%
Below 50% of AAG.DE's 329.75%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-63.99%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.69%
Our AR growth while AAG.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-68.52%
Inventory is declining while AAG.DE stands at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
30.73%
Asset growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 3.08%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
13.43%
Positive BV/share change while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
57.90%
We have some new debt while AAG.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.62%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AAG.DE's 108.64%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.