PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-56.46%
Negative revenue growth while AAG.DE stands at 5.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-119.46%
Negative gross profit growth while AAG.DE is at 2.35%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1378.72%
Negative EBIT growth while AAG.DE is at 1050.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1378.76%
Negative operating income growth while AAG.DE is at 1050.75%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-3782.79%
Negative net income growth while AAG.DE stands at 222.29%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-4039.39%
Negative EPS growth while AAG.DE is at 222.17%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-4039.39%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AAG.DE is at 222.17%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-8.36%
Share reduction while AAG.DE is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-8.33%
Reduced diluted shares while AAG.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.79%
OCF growth under 50% of AAG.DE's 265.99%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
17.75%
FCF growth under 50% of AAG.DE's 239.83%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
31.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AAG.DE's 27.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
-53.15%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-55.05%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.11%
Below 50% of AAG.DE's 144.16%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
421.06%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 212.56%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-205.60%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
3.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
67.24%
Positive short-term CAGR while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.79%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while AAG.DE is at 73.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-65.92%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while AAG.DE shows 2.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-29.33%
Inventory is declining while AAG.DE stands at 14.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
42.58%
Asset growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 2.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-25.14%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
122.78%
We have some new debt while AAG.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.97%
We cut SG&A while AAG.DE invests at 18.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.