PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.82%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 11.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
422.90%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 8.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-81.36%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-81.36%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-91.09%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-84.62%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-84.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
4.18%
Share count expansion well above AAG.DE's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
4.18%
Diluted share change of 4.18% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.29%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 38.86%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-56.39%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-44.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 2.39%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.82%
Below 50% of AAG.DE's 92.32%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
400.17%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-487.40%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-339.14%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-145.27%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.62%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-89.93%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.79%
AR growth well above AAG.DE's 2.56%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
27.02%
Inventory growth well above AAG.DE's 6.68%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-3.64%
Negative asset growth while AAG.DE invests at 8.44%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-75.81%
We have a declining book value while AAG.DE shows 2.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.73%
We have some new debt while AAG.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.68%
SG&A growth well above AAG.DE's 96.09%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.