PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
94.44%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 13.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-96.70%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
129.99%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 44.71%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
107.73%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 44.71%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
86.70%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x AAG.DE's 77.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
86.54%
EPS growth similar to AAG.DE's 79.37%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
86.54%
Similar diluted EPS growth to AAG.DE's 79.37%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
-0.13%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.13%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.75%
Negative OCF growth while AAG.DE is at 168.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-88.61%
Negative FCF growth while AAG.DE is at 159.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
204.00%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 73.48%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
0.49%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
186.06%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 76.37%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.95%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AAG.DE is at 214.14%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-43.18%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 265.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-125.79%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
89.36%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
88.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of AAG.DE's 147.30%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.73%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while AAG.DE is at 0.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-81.71%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.48%
Firm’s AR is declining while AAG.DE shows 16.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-20.67%
Inventory is declining while AAG.DE stands at 4.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-22.12%
Negative asset growth while AAG.DE invests at 7.89%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
34.42%
Positive BV/share change while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
6.53%
We have some new debt while AAG.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.53%
We cut SG&A while AAG.DE invests at 3.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.