PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-32.17%
Negative revenue growth while AAG.DE stands at 11.55%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
1528.49%
Positive gross profit growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-435.07%
Negative EBIT growth while AAG.DE is at 28.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
638.87%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 12.36%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-325.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-204.02%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-204.02%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
40.18%
Share change of 40.18% while AAG.DE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
40.18%
Diluted share change of 40.18% while AAG.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
252.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 98.37%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-65.19%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 9.13%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
174.78%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AAG.DE's 75.01%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
159.08%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AAG.DE's 122.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
-71.71%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AAG.DE is at 4.73%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-51.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 1153.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1010.69%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
67.36%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
36.81%
Below 50% of AAG.DE's 119.79%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
290.39%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of AAG.DE's 331.91%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
-92.27%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-77.43%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.97%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-36.57%
Inventory is declining while AAG.DE stands at 147.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.43%
Asset growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 0.64%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-11.18%
We have a declining book value while AAG.DE shows 0.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
16.50%
Debt growth far above AAG.DE's 7.87%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.32%
We cut SG&A while AAG.DE invests at 12.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.