PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-90.61%
Negative revenue growth while AAG.DE stands at 19.15%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-88.70%
Negative gross profit growth while AAG.DE is at 296.01%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
59.04%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 22.39%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
-123.76%
Negative operating income growth while AAG.DE is at 115.38%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
27.71%
Net income growth at 75-90% of AAG.DE's 33.22%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
15.68%
EPS growth at 50-75% of AAG.DE's 29.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
15.68%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AAG.DE's 33.33%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-14.33%
Share reduction while AAG.DE is at 0.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-14.33%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-80.66%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 111.39%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-94.48%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 18.25%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-95.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AAG.DE stands at 103.80%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AAG.DE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-368.64%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AAG.DE is at 106.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
79.49%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to AAG.DE's 75.33%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
29.94%
Below 50% of AAG.DE's 486.61%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.80%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-94.50%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.25%
Firm’s AR is declining while AAG.DE shows 5.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
27.43%
Inventory growth well above AAG.DE's 2.16%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
13.58%
Positive asset growth while AAG.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-77.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
13.44%
We have some new debt while AAG.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.89%
We cut SG&A while AAG.DE invests at 631.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.