PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-58.30%
Negative revenue growth while FYB.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-131.27%
Negative gross profit growth while FYB.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-103.92%
Negative EBIT growth while FYB.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-103.92%
Negative operating income growth while FYB.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-107.05%
Negative net income growth while FYB.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-107.03%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-107.03%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.60%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 1174.49%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-16.60%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 1174.49%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-16.60%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 460.74%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.11%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-114.11%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-114.11%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.32%
We cut SG&A while FYB.DE invests at 19.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.