PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of FYB.DE's 351.05%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-100.00%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-100.00%
Negative EBIT growth while FYB.DE is at 170.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-100.00%
Negative operating income growth while FYB.DE is at 170.89%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-100.00%
Negative net income growth while FYB.DE stands at 164.64%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-100.00%
Negative EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-100.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while FYB.DE is at 111.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while FYB.DE is at 110.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-16.60%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-16.60%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-16.60%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.11%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-114.11%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-114.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We expand SG&A while FYB.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.