PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.00%
Negative gross profit growth while FYB.DE is at 125.16%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
0.00%
Positive EBIT growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-13.47%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.57%
Negative EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-0.57%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
161.18%
Positive OCF growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
102.27%
Positive FCF growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
66.79%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
66.79%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
66.79%
3Y CAGR of 66.79% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.22%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-128.22%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-128.22%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.43%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.