1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.04%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
1.10%
Positive gross profit growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
155.61%
Positive EBIT growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-342.17%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
159.60%
Positive net income growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
154.23%
EPS growth of 154.23% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
154.23%
Diluted EPS growth of 154.23% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
10.00%
Share change of 10.00% while FYB.DE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
10.00%
Diluted share change of 10.00% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.37%
Positive OCF growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-1547.13%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
195.80%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
195.80%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
195.80%
Positive 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.35%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-25.35%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-25.35%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.99%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-35.24%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
341.70%
BV/share growth of 341.70% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-80.42%
We’re deleveraging while FYB.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.79%
SG&A growth well above FYB.DE's 1.79%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.