PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-69.22%
Negative revenue growth while FYB.DE stands at 23.31%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
51.02%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 16.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-579.48%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
42.36%
Positive operating income growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-543.23%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-548.72%
Negative EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-548.72%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.79%
Positive OCF growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-96.42%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-54.47%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 44436.02%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-54.47%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-54.47%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 6888.91%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-265.42%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-265.42%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is 7.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-265.42%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE is 66.32%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.16%
Firm’s AR is declining while FYB.DE shows 7.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
340.13%
Inventory growth well above FYB.DE's 33.79%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-8.06%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-52.70%
We have a declining book value while FYB.DE shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
19.06%
Debt growth of 19.06% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.15%
SG&A growth well above FYB.DE's 32.81%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.