1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.45%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-264.59%
Negative gross profit growth while FYB.DE is at 58.58%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-301.28%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-318.02%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-309.71%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-303.49%
Negative EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-303.49%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
5.00%
Slight or no buybacks while FYB.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
5.00%
Slight or no buyback while FYB.DE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.53%
Negative OCF growth while FYB.DE is at 124.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-28.36%
Negative FCF growth while FYB.DE is at 112.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
180.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FYB.DE's 40969.94%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
180.40%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FYB.DE's 12758.12%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
236.23%
3Y CAGR of 236.23% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
172.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 172.84% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-209.66%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-209.66%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-677.32%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.36%
Positive asset growth while FYB.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
89.80%
Positive BV/share change while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-19.92%
We’re deleveraging while FYB.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.76%
SG&A growth well above FYB.DE's 24.54%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.