PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.50%
Negative revenue growth while FYB.DE stands at 17.63%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-120.10%
Negative gross profit growth while FYB.DE is at 112.38%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-208.11%
Negative EBIT growth while FYB.DE is at 520.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-208.30%
Negative operating income growth while FYB.DE is at 518.60%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-399.22%
Negative net income growth while FYB.DE stands at 472.20%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-400.00%
Negative EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 478.57%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-400.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 478.57%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.48%
OCF growth under 50% of FYB.DE's 362.13%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
53.77%
FCF growth under 50% of FYB.DE's 343.35%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
202.52%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FYB.DE's 121351.93%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
202.52%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FYB.DE's 18959.09%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
39.40%
3Y CAGR of 39.40% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.78%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 87.78% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-342.37%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is at 4024.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-342.37%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is 309.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-251.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1067.01%
Equity/share CAGR of 1067.01% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-73.67%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-58.40%
Inventory is declining while FYB.DE stands at 173.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-18.00%
Negative asset growth while FYB.DE invests at 36.90%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-16.67%
We have a declining book value while FYB.DE shows 33.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-40.97%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.04%
We cut SG&A while FYB.DE invests at 11.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.