PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
53.64%
Positive revenue growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-168.68%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-7.40%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-7.39%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-8.95%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.00%
Share count expansion well above FYB.DE's 1.69%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
10.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above FYB.DE's 1.69%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
745.08%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FYB.DE's 178657.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
913.34%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FYB.DE's 13925.87%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
185.69%
3Y CAGR of 185.69% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
308.88%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FYB.DE's 104.83%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
74.90%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 74.90% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-580.12%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-3303.26%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is 86.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-743.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2563.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FYB.DE's 185.56%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
187.23%
Equity/share CAGR of 187.23% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.45%
Our AR growth while FYB.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
89.51%
We show growth while FYB.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.77%
Positive asset growth while FYB.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-28.44%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
67.81%
Debt growth of 67.81% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.07%
We cut SG&A while FYB.DE invests at 24.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.