PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.83%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
176.38%
Positive gross profit growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-34.51%
Negative EBIT growth while FYB.DE is at 37.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-34.40%
Negative operating income growth while FYB.DE is at 36.29%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-34.26%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-33.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-33.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FYB.DE's 5.25%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.92%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-117.68%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
192.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FYB.DE's 79405.37%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
250.44%
5Y CAGR of 250.44% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
541.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FYB.DE's 78.52%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.79%
OCF/share CAGR of 116.79% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-86.07%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-422.31%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-2184.65%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-94.84%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE is 46.68%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
391.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x FYB.DE's 90.85%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.34%
Firm’s AR is declining while FYB.DE shows 46.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-97.41%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-32.60%
Negative asset growth while FYB.DE invests at 36.30%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-19.80%
We have a declining book value while FYB.DE shows 42.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
2.56%
Debt growth of 2.56% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.61%
We expand SG&A while FYB.DE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.