PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-62.44%
Negative revenue growth while FYB.DE stands at 3.64%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-83.77%
Negative gross profit growth while FYB.DE is at 32.79%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-86.58%
Negative EBIT growth while FYB.DE is at 15.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-86.58%
Negative operating income growth while FYB.DE is at 15.51%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-178.45%
Negative net income growth while FYB.DE stands at 13.52%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-183.11%
Negative EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 12.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-183.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 12.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.00%
Share reduction while FYB.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
334.07%
Positive OCF growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
222.11%
Positive FCF growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
6.27%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FYB.DE's 66940.55%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-51.03%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-62.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 85.51%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.13%
OCF/share CAGR of 19.13% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
0.05%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-319.90%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-219.22%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.53%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE is 56.75%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
431.58%
Equity/share CAGR of 431.58% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
11.20%
Below 50% of FYB.DE's 136.95%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.51%
Firm’s AR is declining while FYB.DE shows 19.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-84.52%
Inventory is declining while FYB.DE stands at 6.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-7.39%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-35.34%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
74.13%
Debt growth of 74.13% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.06%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.