PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-39.55%
Negative revenue growth while FYB.DE stands at 7.32%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
2.50%
Positive gross profit growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
33.44%
Positive EBIT growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
33.44%
Positive operating income growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
32.34%
Positive net income growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
42.86%
Positive EPS growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
42.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
20.00%
Share count expansion well above FYB.DE's 10.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
20.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above FYB.DE's 10.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.06%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FYB.DE's 65305.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-63.81%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-85.05%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.71%
OCF/share CAGR of 1.71% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-8.28%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 39.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-347.96%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-432.19%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-253.07%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.66%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-79.36%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 132.16%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.39%
Firm’s AR is declining while FYB.DE shows 17.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6903.06%
Inventory growth well above FYB.DE's 184.85%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
133.54%
Asset growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 44.88%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-28.93%
We have a declining book value while FYB.DE shows 32.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
103.74%
Debt growth of 103.74% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.66%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.