PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-56.46%
Negative revenue growth while FYB.DE stands at 5.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-119.46%
Negative gross profit growth while FYB.DE is at 211.05%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1378.72%
Negative EBIT growth while FYB.DE is at 2565.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1378.76%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-3782.79%
Negative net income growth while FYB.DE stands at 2520.78%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-4039.39%
Negative EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 2270.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-4039.39%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 2236.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-8.36%
Share reduction while FYB.DE is at 11.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-8.33%
Reduced diluted shares while FYB.DE is at 12.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.79%
Positive OCF growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
17.75%
Positive FCF growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
31.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FYB.DE's 20647.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-53.15%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 61.35%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-55.05%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.11%
Positive OCF/share growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
421.06%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FYB.DE's 49.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-205.60%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is at 5538.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
3.70%
Below 50% of FYB.DE's 2138.43%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
67.24%
Below 50% of FYB.DE's 9471.62%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.79%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 1541.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-65.92%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 551.43%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while FYB.DE shows 184.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-29.33%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
42.58%
Asset growth well under 50% of FYB.DE's 1141.68%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-25.14%
We have a declining book value while FYB.DE shows 540.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
122.78%
Debt growth far above FYB.DE's 104.97%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.97%
We cut SG&A while FYB.DE invests at 126.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.