PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.82%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of FYB.DE's 40.86%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
422.90%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 26.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-81.36%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-81.36%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-91.09%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-84.62%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-84.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
4.18%
Share reduction more than 1.5x FYB.DE's 23.13%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
4.18%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FYB.DE's 21.23%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.29%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FYB.DE's 10852.70%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-56.39%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-44.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 3.13%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.82%
Positive OCF/share growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
400.17%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-487.40%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-339.14%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-145.27%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.62%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 784.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-89.93%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 388.89%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.79%
Our AR growth while FYB.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
27.02%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. FYB.DE's 28450.00%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-3.64%
Negative asset growth while FYB.DE invests at 3.65%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-75.81%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
1.73%
Debt shrinking faster vs. FYB.DE's 446.00%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.68%
SG&A growth well above FYB.DE's 24.22%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.