1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
94.44%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x FYB.DE's 76.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
-96.70%
Negative gross profit growth while FYB.DE is at 161.47%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
129.99%
EBIT growth 50-75% of FYB.DE's 174.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
107.73%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of FYB.DE's 169.19%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
86.70%
Net income growth at 75-90% of FYB.DE's 104.10%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
86.54%
EPS growth at 75-90% of FYB.DE's 103.78%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
86.54%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of FYB.DE's 103.78%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
-0.13%
Share reduction while FYB.DE is at 4.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.13%
Reduced diluted shares while FYB.DE is at 5.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.75%
Negative OCF growth while FYB.DE is at 7.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-88.61%
Negative FCF growth while FYB.DE is at 37.81%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
204.00%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FYB.DE's 19936.97%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
0.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FYB.DE's 5.13%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
186.06%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FYB.DE's 67.59%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.95%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-43.18%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-125.79%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is at 129.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
89.36%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
88.27%
Below 50% of FYB.DE's 182.47%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.73%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 661.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-81.71%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 476.71%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.48%
Firm’s AR is declining while FYB.DE shows 153.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-20.67%
Inventory is declining while FYB.DE stands at 69.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-22.12%
Negative asset growth while FYB.DE invests at 6.94%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
34.42%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 14.58%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
6.53%
We have some new debt while FYB.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.53%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.