1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-32.17%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
1528.49%
Positive gross profit growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-435.07%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
638.87%
Positive operating income growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-325.84%
Negative net income growth while FYB.DE stands at 4001.50%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-204.02%
Negative EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 4090.91%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-204.02%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE is at 4090.91%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
40.18%
Share count expansion well above FYB.DE's 1.34%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
40.18%
Diluted share count expanding well above FYB.DE's 0.52%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
252.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FYB.DE's 15209.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-65.19%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 9.15%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
174.78%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FYB.DE's 31.25%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
159.08%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FYB.DE's 90.20%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-71.71%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-51.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 73.95%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1010.69%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is at 1291.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
67.36%
Below 50% of FYB.DE's 9042.33%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
36.81%
Below 50% of FYB.DE's 1216.87%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
290.39%
Below 50% of FYB.DE's 2458.70%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-92.27%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 796.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-77.43%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 406.81%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.97%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-36.57%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
5.43%
Positive asset growth while FYB.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-11.18%
We have a declining book value while FYB.DE shows 16.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
16.50%
Debt shrinking faster vs. FYB.DE's 234.76%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.32%
We cut SG&A while FYB.DE invests at 43.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.